Top cyclocrossers are often not taken seriously because of phenomenon Mathieu van der Poel: “Are we going to make losers of the opposition on road too?”

Top cyclocrossers are often not taken seriously because of phenomenon Mathieu van der Poel: “Are we going to make losers of the opposition on road too?”

The phenomenon you’re referring to is the unique dominance of riders like Mathieu van der Poel, who excels not only in cyclocross but also on the road. Van der Poel’s success in multiple disciplines often leads to the perception that cyclocrossers might be seen as “lesser” in road cycling, especially when they transition between the two. His ability to seamlessly cross over and win on the road can overshadow the accomplishments of more specialized road riders.

The comment “Are we going to make losers of the opposition on road too?” is likely reflecting a concern or frustration that the cross-discipline success of riders like van der Poel diminishes the traditional road racing hierarchy. Road cycling, with its long history and established stars, can feel threatened by newcomers who might not have followed the same specialized, traditionally focused pathway to success.

In a sense, the rise of athletes like van der Poel challenges the idea that road cycling should be the exclusive domain of road-specific riders, and it can create tension among purists who value specialization. It’s an interesting dynamic because while it expands the scope of talent, it can also disrupt longstanding perceptions of what makes a “top” rider in each discipline.